Property Damage

Case Background State Farm filed a lawsuit against Techtronic Industries North America, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., and Does 1–20 after a house fire allegedly caused by a defective charger. The fire occurred at a property insured by State Farm. The malfunctioning charger, sold by the defendants, triggered the incident and caused extensive damage. State Farm paid over $1.18 million to repair and replace affected structures and belongings. The case focuses on the charger’s unsafe condition when it entered the market. Cause Plaintiffs alleged that the charger contained manufacturing and design defects, rendering it unsafe even when used as intended. They claimed the product left the defendants’ control in a dangerous state and lacked adequate warnings or instructions. The defendants, who marketed the product with apparent technical expertise, were accused of ignoring or failing to act on known risks. This alleged negligence and failure to warn directly led to the fire. Injury The fire caused severe damage to the home and destroyed personal property. The insureds suffered significant emotional and financial distress. They lost the use of their residence and faced disruptions to daily life. The complaint emphasized that the incident resulted solely from the charger’s failure—not misuse or external events—and the damages continued to grow after the fire. Damages State Farm reported paying approximately $1,189,618.11 under the insureds’ policy, covering structural repairs, personal property losses, remediation, and temporary housing. Additional costs included deductibles and anticipated future expenses. The lawsuit also referenced the emotional toll and inconvenience experienced by the insureds, seeking compensation beyond financial loss. Key Arguments and Proceedings Legal Representation Plaintiff(s): State Farm General Insurance Company | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Counsel for Plaintiff: Brian S. Letofsky | Dominic J. Fiore Defendant(s): Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. | Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | Does 1–20 Counsel for Defendants: David William Kempen | Jeffrey R. Williams Claims Plaintiffs raised several legal claims: Negligence in manufacturing, design, inspection, and sale Strict product liability: Manufacturing defect Design defect Failure to warn Breach of implied warranties: Merchantability Fitness for a particular purpose They sought full recovery of all losses arising from the incident, including property damage, personal hardship, and any future associated costs. Defense The Defendants filed a general denial under California law, rejecting all allegations and causes of action asserted in State Farm’s complaint. They denied any wrongdoing or liability for the damages caused by the alleged product defect, asserting that neither they nor their employees were responsible for the fire or resulting losses. In their affirmative defenses, the Defendants argued that the complaint failed to state a valid claim and attributed any damages to the negligence or misuse by the plaintiffs or third parties beyond their control. They claimed the charger was not defective, was used improperly, and conformed to applicable safety standards and the state of the art at the time of manufacture. Additionally, they asserted defenses such as superseding cause, failure to mitigate damages, compliance with regulations, and disclaimer of implied warranties. They sought dismissal with prejudice, recovery of legal costs, and any further relief deemed appropriate by the court. Jury Verdict On January 15, 2025, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., rejecting all claims brought by State Farm General Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The jury found that the defendants were not liable for the alleged product defects, negligence, or breach of warranty related to the charger that caused the fire, and awarded no damages to the plaintiffs. Court Documents Court documents are available for purchase upon request at Jurimatic@exlitem.com Write a meta description within 160 characters. excerpt: under 600 characters, Generate a title for this article in under 60 characters give me 15 key words/phrases

In a homeowner insurance dispute stemming from a 2018 roof leak, a Miami jury awarded $60,853.50 to plaintiff Sophie Louise Monique Baillet. The case centered on wind-related property damage that the insurer allegedly underpaid or denied. Baillet claimed she met all policy requirements, while the insurer argued exclusions and noncompliance. On June 4, 2025, the jury found in favor of Baillet, concluding that the insurer breached its contract under Florida law.

Judy Dorcelus and Myrtha Ambroise-Dorcelus secured a $75,000 jury award in a breach of homeowners insurance contract case against Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company. The dispute arose after a sudden plumbing failure caused water damage to their North Miami home. Although the insurer acknowledged the claim, it underpaid the damages, prompting the plaintiffs to sue for full reimbursement.

A Miami jury awarded nearly $140,000 to homeowners Christopher and Jennifer McShane in a lawsuit against Elite Innovation Construction, Inc. The couple claimed the contractor performed faulty roof work, leading to water damage and unsafe living conditions. Despite promises to repair the issues, the contractor failed to act, prompting the plaintiffs to seek damages. The court entered a default judgment after the defendant failed to respond, and a jury later awarded compensation for roof replacement, property damage, and displacement costs.

A Pittsburgh jury awarded $4,365 to landlord Dwayne Kirkland in a lease dispute and granted him legal possession of the property.

A Miami jury denied damages to Henry and Rosa Pena, finding no storm-related loss during their insurance policy period.

A Miami jury awarded $69,914 to homeowners Jorge Trejos and Omar Quintana after finding Citizens Insurance liable for storm-related home damage.

A Miami jury ruled in favor of Citizens Property Insurance, rejecting homeowners’ $30K claim for storm damage under policy exclusions.

A Miami-Dade jury ruled for Citizens Property Insurance in a storm damage case. Jurors found no breach of contract in denying payment for hurricane-related roof and water damage.

A Florida jury awarded $70,149 to homeowners Roger D. Fana and Leticia D. Fana in a property damage insurance dispute against Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. The verdict followed claims that Citizens underpaid for storm-related losses during the 2020-2021 policy period. The jury found that covered damage occurred and Citizens failed to prove any policy exclusion applied. The court granted the homeowners compensatory damages, interest, and court costs.

A Stamford jury awarded $250,000 to Spring Brook Terrace Association, Inc. in a property damage lawsuit against Columbus Gardens of Stamford, Inc. The verdict followed claims that negligent drainage modifications caused repeated flooding on Spring Brook’s property. The jury found that Columbus Gardens’ actions constituted negligence, nuisance, and trespass.

A Connecticut jury awarded $277,000 to plaintiff Dwayne Branch in a premises liability lawsuit against the City of New Haven, following injuries he sustained after tripping on a broken sidewalk slab in front of 41 Highview Terrace. The jury found the City liable for breaching its statutory duty under Connecticut law to maintain public sidewalks in safe condition, awarding $77,000 in economic damages and $200,000 for pain and suffering.