Areas of Law

Tito Flores and his wife, Triana Flores, filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County arising from a January 12, 2023 collision on the northbound 605 Freeway near Whittier Boulevard. Defendant Hakim Hassan Stenson was driving a vehicle owned by Penske Truck Leasing, LLC and allegedly employed by CDS Moving Equipment, Inc. The plaintiffs claim Stenson was acting within the scope of his employment at the time.The complaint alleges that Stenson negligently operated the truck. Penske Truck Leasing allegedly owned and entrusted the vehicle, while CDS Moving Equipment employed the driver. The plaintiffs further allege negligent ownership, maintenance, repair, and design of the truck, asserting these acts caused the crash and resulting injuries.Tito Flores sustained injuries that impaired his ability to work and participate in recreational, family, and social activities. He was also unable to contribute to the upkeep of the family home. Triana Flores alleges loss of her husband’s su

Galaxia Electronics Co., Ltd., a Korean corporation, manufactured and distributed LED light displays. Beginning in 2010, Galaxia sold goods to Luxmax U.S.A. and VER, delivering millions of dollars’ worth of products. Despite receiving the goods, Luxmax and VER defaulted on payments. In 2015 and 2016, both entities acknowledged specific sums owed to Galaxia. RWS Management, Inc. also signed agreements assuming Luxmax’s debts.In 2016, Scarnechia, operating as POW Productions, allegedly made false promises to pay Galaxia’s debts. Relying on these promises, Galaxia shipped WinVision tiles. RWS failed to pay for the tiles delivered to POW. Galaxia claimed RWS, Scarnechia, and POW conspired to divert funds for their own benefit. Luxmax and RWS ultimately defaulted on payment obligations despite written acknowledgments and assurances.Galaxia asserted it suffered significant financial losses due to the defendants’ fraudulent conduct and breaches of contract. These losses inclu

A California jury awarded $3.3 million to the parents of Joshua Campos, who died at Theo Lacy Jail after alleged delays in medical response and systemic failures in inmate care. The lawsuit cited improper housing of a mentally ill inmate, poor contraband control, and inadequate safety checks as causes of his wrongful death.

In the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Mellisa Morrison sued Mitch Christow and Does 1–20. The case involved an alleged dog attack in San Jose. Morrison claimed Christow owned or controlled a dog with dangerous tendencies. She asserted that Christow knew or should have known about the animal’s behavior. The complaint alleged negligence, strict animal liability, and statutory liability under California Civil Code Section 3342.On September 23, 2018, Morrison was lawfully present in San Jose when Christow’s dog attacked her. She alleged the dog had an unusually dangerous propensity. Christow, according to the complaint, failed to restrain or warn about the dog. The attack occurred without provocation. Morrison argued that Christow’s failure to act caused the incident. She claimed the defendant’s negligence directly led to her injuries and that his inaction disregarded her safety.The attack caused Morrison serious physical injuries. She sustained signi

Lynette Jividen won a $48.26M verdict against Mar Lago Village owners, managers, and contractors after toxic mold from years of roof leaks caused serious health issues, property damage, and loss of use of her apartment. The court rejected defense denials and affirmative defenses, finding the hazardous conditions resulted from negligent and grossly negligent maintenance.

Cristobal Alonso won over $1.16M in damages after a workplace injury at a Chino distribution center. Defendants admitted negligence, leading to a jury award covering medical expenses, pain, and suffering. The case involved claims of unsafe work conditions, premises liability, and products liability, with the defense raising multiple affirmative defenses before trial.

Jesus Alarcon filed a personal injury suit against the City of Los Angeles and 10th Street Property, LLC, after tripping on a raised sidewalk in 2020. He claims over $250,000 in damages for severe shoulder injuries. Defendants deny all allegations, citing comparative fault, lack of duty, and other defenses. The case centers on premises liability and the city’s alleged failure to fix a known hazard.

On December 5, 2024, a Florida jury awarded $310 million in the wrongful death case of Tyre Sampson, who died after falling from the 430-foot Free Fall ride at Icon Park. The verdict followed allegations of safety lapses, inadequate restraints, and negligent inspections. His parents, Nekia Dodd and Yarnell Sampson, received $30M each for pain and suffering and $125M each for future medical and funeral expenses.

Santiago Aguilar sued the City of Los Angeles and Ivette Huntsinger for negligence after a 2019 vehicle collision. Huntsinger denied liability, citing multiple defenses, including comparative negligence and statutory immunity. In July 2024, the parties reached a conditional settlement, with dismissal set for September 2, 2024, avoiding a scheduled August trial.

Plaintiffs accused Google of misusing Android users’ cellular data allowances through undisclosed “passive” transfers. They claimed the practice caused financial harm and benefited Google’s advertising business. Google denied all allegations and raised multiple affirmative defenses. On July 1, 2025, the court awarded $314,626,932 in damages to the plaintiffs, holding Google liable for the full amount.

Eriberto Perez sued the County of San Bernardino and deputies for alleged excessive force and civil rights violations. The defense denied liability and raised multiple legal immunities. After a May 2025 jury trial, the verdict favored the defendants, with Perez awarded no damages and the County recovering costs.

In an ERISA case over denied mental health benefits, the court ruled for plaintiff Dan C., finding the Directors Guild of America–Producer Health Plan improperly denied coverage. The judgment orders payment of owed benefits with interest, allows attorney’s fees, and addresses breaches of fiduciary duties, parity law violations, and improper claim review practices.