Premises Liability
Browse all premises liability jury verdicts and settlements

Miami Jury Awards $20M in Grocery Store Shooting
September 29, 2025
On November 4, 2017, Diego Suarez Perez was robbed and shot outside Tony’s Food Market in Miami’s Liberty City neighborhood. Perez sued the store’s owners, Eddy and Sara Casamayor, and their company, 4 Brothers LLC, for failing to provide adequate security despite repeated crimes on the property. The defense denied liability, calling the shooting unforeseeable. After hearing evidence of prior violent incidents and expert testimony on preventable risks, a Miami-Dade jury ruled for Perez. On July 9, 2025, they awarded him $20 million for past and future pain, suffering, disability, and loss of life enjoyment.

Slip-and-Fall Verdict: Basma Ettalhy Wins $234K
September 29, 2025
A Miami jury ruled in favor of Basma Ettalhy in her lawsuit against MAU Miami, LLC after she slipped and fell at the restaurant. The jury found the restaurant negligent for failing to keep the premises safe and awarded her $234,829 in damages for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.

Hartford Jury Awards $286K in Slip-and-Fall Lawsuit
September 25, 2025
In Hartford, Connecticut, tenant Jerrod Kerr sued his landlord, Symone Morrison, after slipping on ice at 142-144 Francis Avenue on January 5, 2022. Kerr claimed Morrison failed to maintain the driveway safely, remove ice, or warn tenants of the hazard. He suffered severe leg fractures, hip, and knee pain, alleging permanent injury and future medical expenses. Morrison denied negligence and argued Kerr was partly at fault. On July 30, 2025, the jury found Morrison 60% liable and Kerr 40% liable. They awarded $476,736.69 in total damages, reduced to $286,042.01 after factoring comparative negligence. The verdict highlights landlord duties to maintain safe conditions even in winter weather.

Jury Splits Fault in $3.3M Burbank Injury Verdict
September 25, 2025
In Los Angeles, a jury on August 18, 2025, reached a split verdict in Ulrike Zillner’s personal injury lawsuit against Maple Street Burbank Homeowners Association and Ross Morgan & Company, Inc. Zillner claimed unsafe property conditions caused her severe injuries and lasting harm. The jury found both defendants negligent assigning 30% fault to Ross Morgan and 5% to Maple Street HOA while holding Zillner herself 65% responsible. Damages totaled $3,335,000.12, including $935,000 for future medical expenses, $550,000 for past pain and suffering, and $1,850,000 for future noneconomic losses. After apportioning fault, her recovery was significantly reduced. The verdict underscores how comparative negligence can dramatically affect awards in premises liability cases.

Jury Awards $1.18M in Cemetery Crash Injury Lawsuit
September 25, 2025
A Los Angeles jury awarded $1.18 million to Jay Mitsuru Takaki and Rosa I. Takaki after a devastating crash inside Eternal Valley Memorial Park and Mortuary. On December 2, 2020, a heavily loaded truck and trailer lost control on a steep cemetery hill and slammed into the Takakis’ vehicle, leaving them with severe injuries. The Plaintiffs accused SCI California Funeral Services, Inc., and Jimmie Wayne and Bruce Phillips of negligence for allowing such a dangerous delivery on steep terrain. The jury agreed, finding SCI 60% liable and the Phillips defendants 40% liable. Damages included past and future medical expenses, pain, and emotional suffering—$360,000 for Jay Takaki and $820,000 for Rosa Takaki. The verdict underscored property owners’ duty to prevent foreseeable risks and ensure public safety.

Fresno Jury Awards $821K in Applebee’s Slip-and-Fall
September 24, 2025
A Fresno jury awarded Martha Lopez $821,989.68 after she slipped and fell inside a local Applebee’s. Lopez alleged the restaurant failed to maintain safe floors or post warnings. The jury agreed, finding Applebee’s negligent and fully responsible for her injuries, awarding both economic and non-economic damages.

Home Depot Los Angeles Slip-and-Fall Verdict: $6.63M
September 23, 2025
Henrietta Castrellon filed a premises liability lawsuit against Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. after a slip-and-fall accident at a Los Angeles store. Castrellon claimed the retailer failed to maintain safe walkways, causing her serious injuries that required extensive medical treatment and affected her daily life. Home Depot denied wrongdoing, arguing it had no notice of any hazard and suggested Castrellon bore responsibility for her injuries. After hearing testimony and reviewing evidence, a Los Angeles jury on September 15, 2025, found Home Depot negligent and awarded Castrellon $6,626,602.98 in damages, including past and future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. The jury also determined Castrellon shared some responsibility for her harm.

Chip Brown v. ICO Development: Los Angeles Slip-and-Fall
September 23, 2025
On March 8, 2021, Chip Brown visited the Mercantile Lofts in downtown Los Angeles. As he stepped onto the building’s entrance ramp, a worker power-washed the area, leaving water pooled on the surface. Brown slipped on the wet concrete and fractured his left tibia and fibula, also damaging ankle ligaments. He required surgery, months of therapy, and missed work. Brown sued ICO Development, LLC, alleging negligence and premises liability. He said the company failed to provide slip-resistant surfaces, proper drainage, and warning signs during cleaning. ICO Development denied wrongdoing, claiming Brown was careless and that other parties might share blame. After testimony from medical and safety experts, the jury found ICO Development negligent and concluded its actions substantially caused Brown’s injuries. Damages included compensation for medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and lasting impairment.

Connecticut Jury Clears Owner in Bracero Injury Lawsuit
September 23, 2025
On May 12, 2021, delivery driver Mario Bracero tripped on a pothole in the driveway of 21 Jencks Street, East Hartford, while delivering a package. He alleged the property owner, Peterrill Guthrie, negligently failed to maintain safe conditions. Bracero said the fall caused lasting pain, loss of income, and diminished quality of life. Guthrie denied wrongdoing, claiming Bracero’s inattention caused the accident. After hearing evidence and arguments, a Connecticut jury sided with Guthrie on August 29, 2025, absolving the owner of all liability and denying Bracero’s claims for damages.

$26K Settlement in SF Sidewalk Injury Case
September 23, 2025
On November 7, 2022, Mary Tuimavave tripped on an uneven sidewalk near 2 Connecticut Street in San Francisco, an area maintained by Gabia Konce and the City and County of San Francisco. She claimed both parties knew or should have known about the hazardous condition but failed to repair or warn about it. Tuimavave said she suffered serious injuries, ongoing pain, and loss of income. After denying liability and raising multiple defenses, the City and Konce agreed to a $26,250 conditional settlement on March 26, 2025, resolving all claims from the incident.

Los Angeles Settles Sidewalk Injury Case for $150K
September 22, 2025
Plaintiff Francisco Hernandez Tello sued the City of Los Angeles after tripping on a protruding pole base on a public sidewalk. He claimed the City failed to maintain, inspect, or warn about the hazard. The City denied liability, raising defenses of negligence, assumption of risk, and statutory immunities. The case was set for trial in February 2025, but the parties reached a conditional $150,000 settlement in December 2024, with dismissal due by March 30, 2025.

Alba Rivera Case Settled for $200K After Tree Collapse
September 22, 2025
On October 28, 2019, a tree collapsed on Alba Rivera’s car at 19146 Stare Street, Northridge, California. Rivera claimed the property’s owners and managers—Stephen and Susan Ruda, the Estate of Zepur Karamanoukian, and the City of Los Angeles failed to maintain the premises safely. She alleged negligent oversight and hazardous conditions caused the collapse, leading to serious injuries, vehicle damage, and financial losses. Defendants denied liability, citing negligence by others, assumed risk, and statutory immunities. Before the January 2025 trial, the parties reached a conditional settlement filed on November 20, 2024. They must complete settlement terms and file for dismissal by March 31, 2025, resolving all claims without trial.