San Francisco Pays $100K in Premises Liability Settlement
Table of Contents
Case Background
Plaintiff Sherrell Whitfield initiated a lawsuit against the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Housing Authority on February 16, 2022. The filing detailed an incident that had occurred on public property under the Defendants’ control. The case entered the Court's Unlimited Civil Jurisdiction, which signaled that the Plaintiff sought substantial financial compensation for the harm she endured.
The core of the dispute centered on the maintenance and safety of public premises. Whitfield’s complaint claimed that the municipal entities had failed in their duty to properly manage and secure the property, leading directly to the incident that resulted in her injuries and losses. The Defendants, represented by the City Attorney’s Office, officially denied all allegations of wrongdoing in their formal answer to the complaint, setting the stage for litigation.
Cause
The legal basis for the lawsuit was Premises Liability. This category of claim holds property owners or controllers responsible for injuries sustained by others on their premises due to unsafe or dangerous conditions. Whitfield alleged the public property involved was, in fact, dangerous and that the City and the Housing Authority were aware of the hazard.
Injury
The Plaintiff sought recovery for both Personal Injury and Property Damage. The nature of the injuries was not detailed in the public filings but was significant enough to push the case into the highest financial category of the civil Court system. This implied that the costs associated with the physical harm, medical treatment, and other losses exceeded th
Continue Reading This Article
Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.