Jurimatic: Verdicts and Settlements

On December 11, 2025, a federal jury in the Eastern District of Texas delivered a decisive victory for MyChoice, LLC and BarBoards, LLC in their patent infringement lawsuit against Taiv, Inc. The jury determined that Taiv had willfully infringed U.S. Patent No. 10,708,658, a patent covering systems that automate the replacement of undesirable content, such as commercials, on television broadcasts in venues like bars and restaurants. While Taiv argued that the patent claims were invalid, the jury rejected this defense, upholding the patent's validity. Consequently, the jury awarded the plaintiffs $2 million in damages, specified as a lump sum royalty for the past unauthorized use of the technology.

In the case of Marie Henriquez and Alfonso Martinez v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, the homeowners filed a breach of contract lawsuit following the denial of their insurance claim for damages sustained during Hurricane Ian. The insurer denied coverage, asserting that the damage to the property was not caused by the hurricane but was instead the result of "wear and tear, marring, chipping, scratches, dents, and/or deterioration". Following a trial in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court of Broward County, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the homeowners on key liability issues. The jurors determined that the plaintiffs suffered a direct physical loss during the policy period and explicitly rejected the defense's argument that the roof damage was caused by wear, tear, or deterioration.

A Fresno County Superior Court jury awarded over $4.4 million in damages to M.C. Watte Ranches and Brian Watte Farms, finding Nutrien Ag Solutions primarily liable for the loss of their 2020 pistachio harvest. The jury determined that Nutrien Ag Solutions was negligent in its advice regarding the application of the insecticide imidacloprid, which resulted in residue levels exceeding legal safety tolerances and rendered the crops unmarketable. While the jury attributed 20% of the responsibility to the farming operation, they assigned 80% of the fault to Nutrien, awarding significant lost profits and pre-judgment interest to the growers.

A Duval County jury awarded Alejandro Atanacio Saucedo $113,131.27 in medical expenses after finding that Michael Leslie Farrar negligently rear-ended Saucedo's vehicle while driving a company truck owned by Rite-Hite Holding Corporation. The January 2023 collision occurred on Port Jacksonville Parkway when Saucedo was stopped at a stop sign. However, the jury denied non-economic damages after determining Saucedo did not sustain a permanent injury under Florida's no-fault threshold requirements.

A Hartford Superior Court jury awarded Michelle Pollard $350,000 in economic damages after finding that her former attorney John Sodipo and Sodipo Law Group, P.C. committed legal malpractice. Pollard hired Sodipo to represent her following a 2012 rear-end collision, but he failed to file a timely underinsured motorist claim against GEICO, leaving her unable to recover additional compensation for her injuries.

In Dababneh v. Doja, Inc. et al, the plaintiff, Tania Dababneh, filed suit against her former employers in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, alleging severe workplace misconduct. Ms. Dababneh claimed she was subjected to sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and a hostile work environment, which culminated in her wrongful termination in violation of public policy. On November 14, 2025, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury found Doja, Inc. liable for discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination, and determined that individual defendant Ayad Jaber contributed to the hostile work environment. The jury awarded Ms. Dababneh $300,000 in past noneconomic damages and $800,000 in future noneconomic damages. Additionally, finding that Doja, Inc. acted with malice, oppression, or fraud, the jury assessed $900,000 in punitive damages against the corporation. The total judgment amounted to $2,000,000.

In Otranto v. RD America, LLC, the plaintiff, Ignacio Otranto, filed suit against the operators of a Restaurant Depot warehouse in Waterbury, Connecticut, following an incident on December 31, 2022. Mr. Otranto suffered significant injuries, including a crush injury and traumatic neuropraxia to his right thumb, when the top shelf of a shopping cart provided by the store collapsed during use. The plaintiff argued that the defendants were negligent in their duty to inspect and maintain the store's equipment, allowing a hazardous condition to persist. Following a trial in the Superior Court, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on November 19, 2025. The jury awarded Mr. Otranto $9,321.19 in economic damages and $140,000.00 in noneconomic damages, resulting in a total judgment of $149,321.19.

James Thomas Simpson and his wife, Maria Luz Simpson, secured an $11.8 million settlement against the City of Los Angeles following a severe pedestrian accident in Chino, California. The lawsuit alleged that LAPD Officer Alex Anthony Pozo, driving a city-owned vehicle, negligently ran a red light while on duty. This traffic violation caused a third-party driver to lose control and strike James Simpson as he walked on a sidewalk, inflicting catastrophic physical and mental injuries.

Lajos "Lali" Hugyetz, a former five-time world champion kickboxer, sued luxury fitness company Equinox Holdings, Inc. for wrongful termination and disability discrimination. Hugyetz alleged that Equinox fired him while he was on protected medical leave to treat a severe hip condition and care for his ailing mother. He claimed the company failed to accommodate his medical restrictions and retaliated against him for taking leave. A Los Angeles jury found in favor of Hugyetz, determining that Equinox acted with malice, and awarded the plaintiff over $32 million in compensatory and punitive damages.

Leah Hickey filed a negligence suit against Rebecca Harrington following a June 2021 collision in San Francisco where Harrington turned her vehicle left directly into the path of Hickey’s bicycle. Hickey sustained severe injuries, alleging the defendant failed to yield the right of way. Following a jury trial in December 2025, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, calculating total damages at approximately $12.1 million, which included substantial awards for future economic and non-economic losses. However, the jury also applied the doctrine of comparative negligence, assigning 30% of the fault to Hickey and 70% to Harrington.

A Contra Costa County Superior Court jury returned a defense-favorable verdict on November 6, 2025, in a motor vehicle accident case arising from a June 4, 2020 collision on Cypress Avenue in Oakley, California. Plaintiff Ginger Conrad sued driver Rowyn De Witt and vehicle owners James De Witt and Lea McLaughlin De Witt for negligence. The jury answered yes when asked if Rowyn De Witt was negligent but found that negligence was not a substantial factor in causing Conrad's claimed injuries. Because causation was not established, jurors never reached the damages portion of the special verdict form. Conrad sought compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, and noneconomic damages including pain, suffering, and emotional distress. The defense, represented by State Farm's legal department, raised affirmative defenses including comparative negligence, failure to mitigate damages, and apportionment of fault. The trial before Judge Jill Fannin began October 27, 2025, more than five years after the accident and three years after the complaint was filed.

On November 7, 2025, a jury in the Superior Court of Hartford, Connecticut, awarded a combined verdict of $53,786.33 to Roshona Chase and four minor children following a lawsuit against Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. The case stemmed from a violent hit-and-run collision on May 28, 2020, in Hartford. The Plaintiffs were passengers in a vehicle that was struck by a speeding, stolen car that subsequently fled the scene. Because the at-fault driver was never identified, the Plaintiffs sought compensation under their driver's uninsured motorist (UM) policy. While Progressive admitted the policy was in force, they contested the Plaintiffs' entitlement to the specific benefits claimed. The jury found in favor of the Plaintiffs, awarding damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering, including permanent injuries and nervous system shock sustained by the mother and children.