Breach Of Contract Jury Verdicts Settlements

The City and County of San Francisco sued Michael E. Johnson and affiliated entities over a $5.5 million redevelopment loan tied to the Fillmore Heritage Center. The City alleged breach of contract after repeated defaults, claiming Johnson was the alter ego of his companies. Defendants denied liability and raised numerous defenses, including waiver, duress, and impossibility. A full settlement was filed in July 2023, and the court dismissed the case on August 13, 2025.

Galaxia wins $11.5M+ in LED display debt case; jury clears Murphy of promissory fraud.

In a commercial lease dispute, BAFFS sued Appliance Outlet, Inc. and guarantor Agasi Davtyan for unpaid rent, property damage, and abandonment of premises. The court awarded $402,035.75 to BAFFS after finding the defendants liable for breach of contract, guaranty, and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The negligence claim was denied. Defendants had raised over 30 defenses, which the court rejected.

Pluum Construction filed a fourth-party complaint against subcontractors after a homeowner sued over alleged construction defects. While denying direct fault, Pluum argued the subcontractors caused the issues and sought indemnity or contribution. The jury ultimately awarded the homeowner $115,120 in damages, including $41,442 attributable to Pluum. The case involved multiple parties and complex liability disputes across contract and negligence claims.

In a dispute over the Cardinal Point Wind Power Project, the court granted summary judgment to Black & Veatch Construction, Inc., dismissing The Boldt Company’s $7.2 million breach of contract and quantum meruit claims. Boldt alleged BVCI failed to provide proper site conditions and wrongfully terminated its subcontract. BVCI countered that Boldt mismanaged its responsibilities and failed to mitigate damages. The court sided with BVCI, finding Boldt liable under the subcontract.

On May 25, 2023, Plaintiff Ramon Uriel Moreno filed a breach of contract lawsuit in the Florida State, Miami-Dade County, Eleventh Circuit Court (Case number: 2:22cv422) due to windstorm damage. This case was assigned to Judge Joseph D. Perkins.Ramon Uriel Moreno purchased a residential property insurance policy from Citizens Property Insurance Corporation to protect his home at 13600 SW 181 St., Miami, FL 33177. He consistently paid his premiums, ensuring that the policy remained active. On August 3, 2021, a severe windstorm struck his property, causing extensive structural damage. The strong winds compromised the home’s integrity, affecting the roof, exterior walls, and other essential components. Moreno recognized the severity of the dama

In Black Star Investment Group LLC v. Pro Quip LLC et al., a Florida court awarded $4,000 for breach of contract after Plaintiff alleged a used skid steer was sold with false claims about its condition and warranty. Fraud and misrepresentation claims were dismissed after the court found Plaintiff had waived those claims through disclaimers. Only Pro Quip LLC and Neil Marcellino were held liable for the damages. Claims against other defendants, including Dirt Toys LLC and Martha Ceballos, were dismissed.

In a breach of contract case, the Insureds claimed that their property sustained wind and rain damage while covered under a valid policy. They alleged that the insurer failed to respond, pay, or deny coverage for over three months. The insurer denied liability, citing delayed reporting, lack of documentation, and exclusions like wear, tear, and pre-existing damage. The case centers on compliance with policy conditions and the insurer’s duty to investigate and pay covered claims.

A Florida jury awarded SK Invest Group $735,610 after finding First Florida International (FFI) and owner Edward Genin liable for charging for work never performed, breaching contract, and committing fraud in a renovation project.

In a landmark decision, a California jury found NSO Group liable for hacking roughly 1,400 mobile phones belonging to attorneys, activists, and journalists. The verdict confirms that NSO Group violated federal and state computer intrusion laws, making it a pivotal case for digital privacy and cybersecurity enforcement.

A New York federal jury recently awarded $21,980,444.70 in a breach of contract lawsuit brought by Sanmina Corporation against Dialight PLC over a terminated manufacturing agreement. The case, filed in the Southern District of New York, concluded after the jury found Dialight liable for failing to pay for completed goods and excess materials following its 2018 contract termination, entitling Sanmina to recover unpaid invoices, material costs, and legal fees under the terms of the agreement.

Dawn International sued Jacob Fleishman Sales for $5.2M over unpaid pork shipments and contract breaches. A federal jury sided with Dawn, awarding over $3.76M in damages. Fleishman’s defenses and fraud claims were rejected, marking a major win for the supplier.