Medical Malpractice

On November 17, 2025, a jury in the Circuit Court for Duval County, Florida, returned a defense verdict in favor of Dr. Jack John Messina. The Plaintiff, Louise Tyson, representing the estate of her late husband Paul W. Tyson, filed a medical malpractice and wrongful death lawsuit alleging that negligence during a 2018 heart surgery led to Mr. Tyson's death. The complaint argued that the medical team failed to properly monitor anti-coagulation levels and manage the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system, causing a massive stroke due to blood clots. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed Dr. Messina, as the surgeon, failed to ensure the CPB system was safe before use. However, the jury found that there was no negligence on the part of Dr. Messina that was a legal cause of injury to the decedent.

Rebecca Newman, representing the estate of Margaret Derderian, sued Dr. Matthew Brown, Dr. Anne Lally, and Starling Physicians, P.C. for medical malpractice and wrongful death. The complaint alleged that Dr. Brown failed to meet the standard of care during a fistulogram procedure on the elderly patient, specifically by failing to recognize the high risk of hemorrhage from a fragile vein and discharging her without proper observation. The patient died days later from exsanguination. The defense argued that the treatment met professional standards. A New Britain jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, finding no negligence.

The Orange County Superior Court resolved the medical malpractice lawsuit of Tanisha R. Jackett and Kelvin Jackett v. The Regents of the University of California with a final, negotiated settlement of $550,000. The suit centered on the negligent care Mrs. Jackett received during a complex, nearly twenty-hour Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap procedure at the University of California Irvine Medical Center in October 2020. The Plaintiffs alleged that the medical staff failed to meet the proper standard of care, arguing that improper positioning during the lengthy surgery caused serious, lasting injury. This negligence resulted in Mrs. Jackett suffering from severe headaches, eventually diagnosed as occipital neuralgia, along with hair loss and persistent swelling, injuries she continued to suffer from. Her husband, Kelvin Jackett, sought damages for loss of consortium, as his wife's injuries had severely disrupted their marital relationship. The Regents of the University of California denied the claims, raising defenses that invoked California's MICRA laws, which cap non-economic damages at $250,000 for medical negligence. Despite the strong defense, the parties ultimately negotiated the six-figure settlement, which the Court approved, bringing the high-stakes personal injury case to a conclusion before a jury trial.

A Florida jury awarded Mohamed Abd El Rahman $3,530,250 after finding that orthopedic surgeon Dr. Obinna Adigweme failed to obtain proper informed consent before performing a right hip replacement surgery in July 2020. The plaintiff developed nerve damage and foot drop following the procedure at Orlando Orthopaedic Center. While the jury rejected claims of surgical negligence, it determined that Abd El Rahman would not have consented to the operation if the doctor disclosed all material risks. The verdict included $3.5 million for pain, suffering, and diminished quality of life, plus over $30,000 in medical expenses.

Michael Errar filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Steven H. Katz and Inphynet South Broward LLC following a January 2016 emergency room visit at Memorial Hospital West. Errar presented with severe leg pain and a history of vascular issues but was discharged with a diagnosis of groin pain. Three days later, he returned requiring a leg amputation due to ischemia. Errar alleged Dr. Katz failed to properly diagnose, assess, and monitor his condition, leading to premature discharge. Following a trial in November 2025, a jury found Dr. Katz negligent and awarded Errar $5 million in damages, covering past and future medical expenses, lost earnings, and pain and suffering.

The County of Riverside and Riverside University Health System-Medical Center agreed to pay $2,250,000 to settle a medical malpractice lawsuit filed by Lovell Avery. The case, filed in July 2023, alleged that negligent medical treatment and breaches in professional care standards caused Avery’s lasting physical and emotional injuries. The complaint named the County and several physicians as defendants. Both sides engaged in discovery before reaching an out-of-court settlement that avoided a jury trial. The agreement brought closure to a complex dispute over the standard of care in a county-run hospital.

The lengthy medical malpractice trial, Weinberg, Harlan, Co-Executor of the Estate Et Al v. The Stamford Hospital Et Al (FBT-CV20-6099514-S), reached a decisive conclusion on September 18, 2025. The lawsuit, initially filed against multiple parties, ultimately centered on the claim that Dr. Michael Bernstein, M.D., was medically negligent in the treatment of Robert Joseph Weinberg, who died in May 2018. The Estate of Robert Weinberg had sought substantial damages, arguing that the physician’s actions fell below the acceptable standard of care and directly caused the patient's wrongful death. Following the presentation of conflicting expert testimony regarding the complexity of Mr. Weinberg’s medical condition and the appropriateness of the care rendered, the Bridgeport jury returned a verdict firmly in favor of the defendant, Dr. Bernstein. The jury found that the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proof, thus dismissing the claims of medical negligence and absolving the doctor of liability.

Plaintiff Gariel Brownlee filed a civil rights lawsuit against the County of Los Angeles and multiple staff members, including medical doctors, alleging severe failures in providing adequate medical treatment while he was in County custody. The complaint invoked 42 U.S.C, arguing that the alleged negligence and systemic disregard for detainees' health amounted to cruel and unusual punishment and constituted malpractice. Brownlee sought compensation for lasting physical injury, emotional distress, and future care costs. Just before jury selection commenced, the parties settled the case for $7,000,000. The agreement resolved all claims without an admission of liability by the County.

The lawsuit, Broward Outpatient Medical Center, LLC, et al. v. Medmal Direct Insurance Company (Case No. CACE-21-020771), was an insurance coverage dispute heard in Broward County, Florida. Plaintiffs BOMC and BISC claimed their insurer, Medmal Direct, wrongfully denied coverage and defense for underlying medical malpractice claims related to an insured physician, Merrill Reuter, M.D. The facilities asserted the policy covered them and that Medmal Direct's denial constituted a breach of contract. Medmal Direct, the Defendant, centered its defense on the Plaintiffs' failure to provide claim notice during the policy period, an essential policy requirement, and raised exclusions for fraud or fee disputes. The jury, returning its verdict on July 25, 2025, sided completely with the insurer. Specifically, the jury found that Medmal Direct did not receive a claim notice on behalf of the facilities and did not waive its policy requirement. Furthermore, the jury concluded that the Plaintiffs did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that the insurer made a factual representation that created a basis for equitable estoppel.

A medical malpractice lawsuit was filed in Vanderburgh Circuit Court by John and Andrea Ferguson against Dr. Sridhar Banuru. The Plaintiffs alleged the doctor's care on or about February 18, 2018, fell below the standard of care, causing injury to John Ferguson and loss of consortium to Andrea Ferguson. The Defendant, Dr. Banuru, denied all claims of negligence. His defense prominently relied on a unanimous Medical Review Panel decision finding he did not deviate from the standard of care. The defense further raised statutory limitations and comparative fault as complete defenses. The case proceeded to litigation, with both parties preparing expert testimony regarding the applicable standard of care.

Sarah Jane Early visited her OB-GYN in February 2018, reporting a palpable lump in her right breast. A diagnostic mammogram and ultrasound were performed and reviewed by Dr. Inga Edwin, who reported benign results. No biopsy or follow-up was recommended. Two years later, Ms. Early was diagnosed with stage 3 breast cancer. She filed a lawsuit with her husband against both Dr. Edwin and nurse practitioner Mary Blanchard for failing to act on clinical signs. On March 10, 2025, a Johnston County jury found both Defendants negligent, holding them responsible for the delay in diagnosis and resulting harm.

The wrongful death case of Theod Simonian, et al. v. Glendale Adventist Medical Center, et al. stemmed from the 2018 death of 77-year-old Razmi Simon. After a hip surgery at Glendale Adventist, Simon’s health declined rapidly following chest pain, a heart attack, kidney failure, and cardiac arrest. His family alleged malpractice, negligence, and wrongful death, claiming hospital staff ignored warning signs and mishandled his care. Defendants, including physicians and Adventist Health, denied liability, arguing Simon’s age and health complications explained his decline. On August 21, 2025, a Los Angeles jury returned a defense verdict, finding no negligence by Dr. Michael Abdulian or Dr. Vahe Badalian. The Simon family did not receive compensation.