
PB Ocean Condos v. KDTD: $1.4M Construction Defects Settlement
A San Diego construction defects case ended in a $1.4 million settlement after PB Ocean Condos, LLC sued general contractor KDTD, Inc. dba KD Development over widespread building failures at a 16-unit apartment complex. The property owner alleged the contractor failed to properly supervise construction work, resulting in flat roof drainage problems, excessive stucco cracking, balcony waterproofing failures, window and door leaks, corroded HVAC systems, and water intrusion throughout the structur...
Read MoreRecent Articles
Are You an Expert Witness?
Increase your visibility and get more cases
Top Areas of Law
Latest Verdicts & Settlements

PB Ocean Condos v. KDTD: $1.4M Construction Defects Settlement
December 10, 2025
A San Diego construction defects case ended in a $1.4 million settlement after PB Ocean Condos, LLC sued general contractor KDTD, Inc. dba KD Development over widespread building failures at a 16-unit apartment complex. The property owner alleged the contractor failed to properly supervise construction work, resulting in flat roof drainage problems, excessive stucco cracking, balcony waterproofing failures, window and door leaks, corroded HVAC systems, and water intrusion throughout the structure. The lawsuit, filed in September 2024 in San Diego Superior Court, asserted claims for negligence, breach of express and implied warranties, and breach of contract stemming from a March 2018 construction agreement. The defendant denied all allegations and raised 44 affirmative defenses before the parties reached a settlement resolution.

Bank of America Settles $4.4M California Wage Theft Lawsuit
December 10, 2025
Andrea Sosa, a former hourly employee of Bank of America, filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court alleging the bank violated California labor laws. The complaint claimed remote workers completed lengthy VPN login procedures before clocking in without compensation. Sosa also alleged the bank rounded time punches to benefit the employer, failed to include bonus pay when calculating overtime rates, and did not reimburse employees for using personal internet and cell phones for work. Bank of America denied all allegations and raised 42 affirmative defenses. The parties reached a $4,400,000 settlement resolving claims on behalf of current and former hourly non-exempt employees throughout California.

Circuit Board Workers Win $592K Wage Theft Class Settlement
December 10, 2025
A former machine operator secured a $592,500 class action settlement against South Coast Circuits, Inc. and Royal Flex Circuits, Inc., two Orange County printed circuit board manufacturers. The lawsuit alleged the companies violated California labor laws by denying workers legally required meal and rest breaks, failing to pay minimum and overtime wages, and using a timekeeping system that rounded hours in the employer's favor.

SHRM Hit With $11.6M Verdict in Race Discrimination Lawsuit
December 9, 2025
A federal jury in Colorado awarded $11.6 million to Rehab Mohamed, a former employee of the Society for Human Resource Management, after finding that SHRM terminated her because of her race and in retaliation for her discrimination complaints. The verdict included $1.6 million in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages. Mohamed, a 34-year-old Egyptian Arab woman, alleged her supervisor treated her more strictly than white colleagues and fired her after she complained about racial bias.

Caravantes v. Gil & Roy Studios $470K Wage Settlement
December 9, 2025
David Caravantes filed a class action lawsuit against Gil & Roy Studios, LLC and Modernica, Inc. alleging systematic wage and hour violations against hourly non-exempt employees in California. The Plaintiff claimed the Defendants rounded down employee work hours, failed to provide proper meal and rest periods, and did not reimburse workers for employment-related expenses. On November 4, 2025, Judge Elaine Lu approved a $470,000 settlement that compensated affected workers who were employed between June 2019 and August 2024.

San Bernardino Child Abuse Case Settles for $10.5M
December 9, 2025
Two young brothers secured a $10.5 million settlement against San Bernardino County and multiple social workers after the Department of Children and Family Services failed to protect them from abuse and returned them to parents who ultimately tortured and murdered their infant brother Jamari Mendez in April 2022. The plaintiffs, identified as J.G. and J.M., witnessed their baby brother's killing after social workers ignored warning signs including documented domestic violence, drug use, and protective orders against their father Ricardo Mendez. The case settled in March 2025, days before trial was scheduled to begin.

$3.5M Verdict: Hip Surgery Informed Consent Case in Florida
December 8, 2025
A Florida jury awarded Mohamed Abd El Rahman $3,530,250 after finding that orthopedic surgeon Dr. Obinna Adigweme failed to obtain proper informed consent before performing a right hip replacement surgery in July 2020. The plaintiff developed nerve damage and foot drop following the procedure at Orlando Orthopaedic Center. While the jury rejected claims of surgical negligence, it determined that Abd El Rahman would not have consented to the operation if the doctor disclosed all material risks. The verdict included $3.5 million for pain, suffering, and diminished quality of life, plus over $30,000 in medical expenses.

$2.1M Motor Vehicle Negligence Verdict
December 8, 2025
On December 25, 2022, Yasmin Razavipour was driving north on Roberts Road in Saint Johns, Florida, when Dylan Tarongoy attempted a left turn without yielding to oncoming traffic. The collision resulted in serious, permanent injuries that required extensive medical treatment and fundamentally altered Razavipour's quality of life. After nearly three years of litigation, a jury found Tarongoy 85 percent responsible for the accident while assigning only 15 percent comparative negligence to Razavipour. The jury awarded the Plaintiff a total of $2,113,680.60, including $113,680.60 for past medical expenses, $400,000 for future medical care, and $1,600,000 for future pain and suffering and loss of life enjoyment. This significant verdict demonstrates the serious consequences of distracted driving and failure to maintain a proper lookout at roadway intersections.

Rear-End Crash Lawsuit Fails: Jury Rules for Defendant Miami
December 5, 2025
A Miami-Dade County jury ruled in favor of the defendant in a rear-end collision lawsuit on June 5, 2025. Donna Nasimov sued Evan Fuertes after a September 14, 2018 crash on SW 152nd Street, claiming she sustained permanent injuries when Fuertes struck her stopped vehicle from behind, pushing her into another car. The plaintiff sought damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and lost earnings. The defense argued Nasimov failed to meet Florida's No-Fault threshold requirements and challenged her claimed injuries. After nearly six years of litigation, the jury found that the defendant's negligence was not a legal cause of the plaintiff's damages, resulting in a complete defense verdict with no monetary award.

Ceiling Collapse Verdict: $175K Award in Miami Landlord Case
December 5, 2025
A Miami-Dade County jury awarded $175,000 to a married couple after a ceiling collapsed on the wife while she slept in her apartment. Raquel Recio de Roman and Cesar Roman sued their landlord, Little Havana Equities, LLC, following the June 29, 2024 incident at 1028 SW 3rd Street, Miami. The jury returned its verdict on June 11, 2025, awarding Mrs. Roman $150,000 for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and related damages. Her husband received $25,000 for loss of consortium. The plaintiffs argued the property owner failed to maintain the structural elements of the building and knew or should have known about the dangerous ceiling condition. The defense claimed the incident was caused by third parties or an Act of God, but the jury rejected these arguments.

Express Mobile Wins $170M Verdict Against GoDaddy
December 5, 2025
On November 6, 2025, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Case No. 1:19-cv-01937) returned a unanimous verdict in the patent infringement lawsuit filed by Express Mobile, Inc. against GoDaddy.com, LLC. Express Mobile, an inventor-owned company, alleged that GoDaddy's Website Builder and WordPress Website products infringed its foundational patents related to browser-based website creation tools. The trial focused on two of the five originally asserted patents: U.S. Patent No. 6,546,397 and U.S. Patent No. 7,594,168. The jury awarded Express Mobile total damages in the amount of $170,000,000.00 ($170 Million), structured as royalties over the life of the patents. This figure represents the full amount of damages sought by Express Mobile. GoDaddy had asserted multiple defenses, including non-infringement and patent invalidity. The verdict represents a significant victory for Express Mobile on the liability questions and marks one of the year's largest patent verdicts against a mainstream internet platform.

Jury Awards $5M for Leg Amputation in Medical Malpractice Case
December 4, 2025
Michael Errar filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Steven H. Katz and Inphynet South Broward LLC following a January 2016 emergency room visit at Memorial Hospital West. Errar presented with severe leg pain and a history of vascular issues but was discharged with a diagnosis of groin pain. Three days later, he returned requiring a leg amputation due to ischemia. Errar alleged Dr. Katz failed to properly diagnose, assess, and monitor his condition, leading to premature discharge. Following a trial in November 2025, a jury found Dr. Katz negligent and awarded Errar $5 million in damages, covering past and future medical expenses, lost earnings, and pain and suffering.
On the Stand with Ashish Arun
A podcast on the law, practice and business of expert witness testimony. Listen to the latest episodes.





















