$8M Verdict in Maura Gallagher Stamford Hospital Case
Table of Contents
Case Background
John P. Gallagher, as administrator of the estate of his late wife, Maura B. Gallagher, brought a medical malpractice and wrongful death action against Stamford Health, Inc., doing business as Stamford Hospital, along with multiple physicians and affiliated medical groups. Maura, a 38-year-old mother expecting twins, had been admitted on May 8, 2017, for a scheduled caesarean section. She displayed signs of preeclampsia, including elevated blood pressure, low platelet count, and high urine protein. Despite these warning signs, the lawsuit claimed her care team failed to act promptly and appropriately, leading to complications during and after surgery.
Events That Had Led to the Dispute
According to the complaint, Maura’s symptoms and test results clearly indicated preeclampsia. The lawsuit alleged that her care team failed to respond to these indicators in time, did not deliver her babies sooner despite dangerous lab findings from May 5, and did not follow standard hospital protocols for managing the condition.
During surgery, Maura’s blood pressure remained high, and she experienced an intraoperative seizure. Instead of treating it as a seizure, records described it as an “anxiety attack” or “panic attack.” After surgery, she continued to experience nausea, vomiting, headaches, and elevated blood pressure, but the Plaintiff claimed these symptoms were treated superficially rather than as warning signs of a neurological emergency.
By mid-afternoon, Maura lost consciousness and began agonal breathing. A CT scan showed a massive, non-survivable intracerebral hemorrhage. She was declared brain dead later that evening and officially pronounced dead the following day.
Injury
Maura’s injuries included severe headaches, vomiting, seizures, dangerously high blood pressure, and an eventual brain bleed. The Plaintiff alleged she endured hours of conscious pain and suffering before her collapse. The brain hemorrhage left her with no chance of survival, causing her death within a day of giving birth.
Damages
The lawsuit sought damages for Maura’s conscious pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of earning capacity. It also sought compensation for the impact of her death on her new-born twins and her family, funeral and burial costs, and the destruction of her ability to participate in life’s activities.
The Plaintiff argued that Maura’s death deprived her children of their mother, her husband of his spouse, and her family and friends of her companionship and support.
Key Arguments and Proceedings:
Legal Representation
• Plaintiff(s): John P. Gallagher Administrator of The Estate of Maura Gallagher
• Counsel for Plaintiff(s): Daniel a Thomas | Marissa Bellair
• Expert for Plaintiff(s): David J. Langer | Michele Silverstein | Gary M. Crakes | Donald Hanson | Don DeCrosta
• Defendant(s): Stamford Health, Inc. D/B/A Stamford Hospital
• Counsel for Defendant(s): Rebecca N. Brindley | Eric J. Stockman
• Expert for Defendant(s): Baba M. Sibai | Gary G. Wharton | David Zagzag | Cenk Ayata | Issam Abdullah Awad | Phillip Dickey | Daniel Katz | Mark Lebovits | Michele Silverstein | Robert Babkowski | Maria Mazzeo
Claims
The Plaintiff had filed twelve counts of medical malpractice and wrongful death against Stamford Health, Inc., Stamford Hospital, Stamford Health System, Inc., multiple doctors including Dr. Astrid Hoffmann-Olsen, Dr. Kiger Lau, Dr. Maria Mazzeo, Stamford Anesthesiology Services, and several affiliated medical groups. The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendants had failed to:
· Timely diagnose and manage preeclampsia.
· Monitor vital signs, blood counts, and protein levels.
· Recognize and treat a seizure consistent with eclampsia.
· Appropriately manage fluids and medications.
· Initiate delivery on May 5, 6, or 7 despite known risks.
· Provide Maura with adequate postpartum monitoring and care.
Additionally, the Plaintiff raised claims under the theory of "loss of chance," asserting that Maura had been deprived of a significant opportunity for successful treatment and survival due to the Defendants’ failures. Each claim included demands for economic damages, non-economic damages, punitive damages where appropriate, and compensation for pain, suffering, and loss of life’s enjoyment.
Defense Arguments
The Defendants Dr. Astrid Hoffman-Olsen, Women’s Health Connecticut, Inc., Physicians for Women’s Health, LLC, Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, and Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, PC formally responded to the Plaintiff’s Revised Complaint by systematically denying or contesting the material allegations brought against them.
The Defendants denied negligence, disputed the timeline of events, and rejected the claim that any alleged failures caused Maura’s death. They argued that the brain bleed was a sudden, unpredictable complication, and that Maura’s care, including anesthesia and surgical procedures, was appropriate.
They also challenged the Plaintiff’s medical experts on causation, claiming that even earlier delivery or different management would not have changed the outcome.
Jury Verdict
After hearing weeks of testimony and reviewing the evidence, the jury returned a verdict on April 23, 2025, in favor of the Plaintiff, John Gallagher. The jury awarded $8,000,000.05 in damages.
The award covered economic losses such as Maura’s lost earning capacity and funeral expenses, and non-economic losses for her pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and the harm caused to her family by her death.
The verdict sent a strong message about the importance of recognizing and responding to high-risk pregnancy complications and the duty of medical providers to follow established safety protocols.
Court Documents