Jurimatic by Exlitem

NC Jury Awards Verdict in Missed Cancer Diagnosis Case

NC Jury Awards Verdict in Missed Cancer Diagnosis Case

S
Sohini Chakraborty
October 1, 2025

Table of Contents

Case Background

This case arose from a delayed diagnosis of breast cancer that Plaintiff Sarah Jane Early claimed could have been treated earlier had the Defendants met the appropriate standard of medical care. The lawsuit named multiple parties, including Inga Edwin, M.D., a radiologist with Raleigh Radiology, and Mary M. Blanchard, a nurse practitioner at Kamm McKenzie OB-GYN, along with their respective institutions.

On February 7, 2018, Ms. Early had visited her OB-GYN office for her annual exam. During that appointment, she had expressed concern about a dense area in her right breast. Upon examination, a 3-4 cm mass had been detected. A diagnostic mammogram and ultrasound were performed two days later and reviewed by Dr. Edwin, who had reported benign findings. Based on this reading, no biopsy had been recommended, and Ms. Early had not been instructed to follow up.

It was not until over two years later, in May 2020, that Ms. Early had undergone a second mammogram this time at Duke Health which had revealed a malignant mass. A biopsy confirmed that she had stage 3 breast cancer. She immediately began aggressive treatment. Ms. Early and her husband, Jason Stephen Early, filed suit for medical negligence and loss of consortium.

Cause that led to the legal dispute

The lawsuit was based on medical negligen

Continue Reading This Article

Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.

Unlimited access to all articles
Expert legal analysis and insights
Downloadable resources and templates
Subscribe Now Login to Access

You've reached your free article limit for this month

Tags

Medical Malpractice
Loss Of Consortium
Delayed Diagnosis
Radiology Error
Cancer Misdiagnosis

About the Author

SC
Sohini Chakraborty
Editor
Sohini Chakraborty is a law graduate, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies. She delivers well-structured legal summaries.