Jurimatic by Exlitem

Los Angeles Settles Whistleblower Case for $5.75M

Los Angeles Settles Whistleblower Case for $5.75M

S
Sohini Chakraborty
November 12, 2025

Table of Contents

Case Background

Dr. Kristen Wheldon, a respected clinical psychologist, had provided psychological services for a key department within the City of Los Angeles for several years when a high-stakes disagreement with her superiors emerged. The central dispute began when Dr. Wheldon uncovered what she believed were serious ethical and procedural violations related to the department’s operational integrity.

The psychologist believed the violations created an immediate risk to public safety and professional standards. She meticulously documented her concerns and officially reported them through the proper internal channels, fulfilling her legal and ethical duty to the City and its residents. However, shortly after she made her report, the workplace dynamic shifted dramatically, and her professional environment became hostile. She alleged that the City's reaction was not to investigate the wrongdoing she cited, but to swiftly target her career.

Cause

Whistleblower Retaliation

Dr. Wheldon’s central accusation centered on the claim that the City of Los Angeles, through its various supervisors and agents, had retaliated against her after she blew the whistle. She maintained that the City’s actions including demoting her, taking away significant responsibilities, subjecting her to unwarranted and negative performance reviews, and isolating her from colleagues were direct punitive measures for having reported the serious misconduct. She asserted that this retaliation violated California Labor Code Section 1102.5, which exists to protect employees who report illegal or unethical activities by their employers.

Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation

The complaint included claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The retaliation against Dr. Wheldon had included a targeted campaign of harassment that created a hostile work environment. She argued the City’s actions constituted retaliation in violation of FEHA, as the negative treatment she experienced followed her protected

Continue Reading This Article

Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.

Unlimited access to all articles
Expert legal analysis and insights
Downloadable resources and templates
Subscribe Now Login to Access

You've reached your free article limit for this month

Tags

Government Liability
Whistleblower Retaliation
Feha
Workplace Rights

Experts Referenced

DW
David Wellisch
Psychiatry
PB
Paul E. Broadus
Vocational
SB
Susan Phelps Bleecker
Accounting
FG
Dr. Fernando Gonzalez
Clinical Psychology

About the Author

SC
Sohini Chakraborty
Editor
Sohini Chakraborty is a law graduate, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies. She delivers well-structured legal summaries.