Jurimatic by Exlitem

Jury Splits Fault in $3.3M Burbank Injury Verdict

Jury Splits Fault in $3.3M Burbank Injury Verdict

S
Sohini Chakraborty
September 25, 2025

Table of Contents

Case Background

In a civil trial that concluded in a Los Angeles Courtroom, a jury delivered a split verdict in a personal injury case, finding both the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared responsibility for the harm she suffered. The case was filed by Ulrike Zillner against two companies: Maple Street Burbank Homeowners Association and Ross Morgan & Company, Inc. The lawsuit, which had been filed on May 19, 2020, in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, alleged that Ms. Zillner was hurt on a property that the two Defendants were responsible for maintaining.

The complaint contended that the Defendants had a duty to keep the premises safe for residents and visitors. Ms. Zillner, the Plaintiff, claimed that the Defendants failed to uphold that duty and that their negligence was the direct cause of her injuries and losses. The case proceeded to a jury trial where both sides presented their arguments and evidence.

Cause

The lawsuit stated that Ms. Zillner's injuries happened because of a negligent or careless condition on the property that the Defendants managed. The complaint did not specify the exact nature of the dangerous condition. However, it broadly alleged that the Defendants had control over the property's upkeep and that they did not manage it responsibly. The Plaintiff argued that the Defendants' failure to take action created an unsafe environment, which then led to her harm.

Injury

As a result of the incident, Ms. Zillner suffered what she described as severe and permanent injuries. The complaint claimed that she endured substantial physical, mental, and emotional pain and suffering. Her ability to carry out her normal daily activities was affected, and she was prevented from performing her usual job. The complaint also stated that she faced an unknown duration of lost income because of her inability to work.

Damages Sought

Ms. Zillner sought financial compensation for all of her injuries and losses. She asked the jury to award her what are known as "general damages" fo

Continue Reading This Article

Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.

Unlimited access to all articles
Expert legal analysis and insights
Downloadable resources and templates
Subscribe Now Login to Access

You've reached your free article limit for this month

Tags

Comparative Negligence
Unsafe Property Conditions

Experts Referenced

PK
Dr. Paul Edward Kaloostian
Neurosurgery
DL
Dr. David Michael Lechuga
Neuropsychology
MB
Dr. Mark G. Blanchette
Biomechanics
DF
Dr. Daniel T. Franc
Psychology
MB
Mark J. Burns
Forensic Engineering
GT
Dr. Gregory H. Tchejeyan
Orthopaedic Surgery
MK
Dr. Manon Kwon
Emergency Medicine
MM
Dr. Michael Morad Marvi
Neurology
NZ
Natalie Zhitnitsky
Speech-Language Pathology
KM
Dr. Kasra Maasumi
Neurology

About the Author

SC
Sohini Chakraborty
Editor
Sohini Chakraborty is a law graduate, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies. She delivers well-structured legal summaries.