Jurimatic by Exlitem

Jury Rules for Defendant in Oregon Land Dispute

Jury Rules for Defendant in Oregon Land Dispute

S
Sohini Chakraborty
October 7, 2025

Table of Contents

Case Background

Kenneth Larson and Diana Larson, the Plaintiffs, owned real property in Myrtle Creek, Oregon. Their property included Lots 30 and 31 of the Boulevard Park Addition. Rebecca Fraze, the Defendant, owned nearby property which included Lots 32, 33, and 34. The Defendant's property was situated on the northeast corner of a hill from the Plaintiffs' property. This boundary relationship was central to the dispute.

The Larsons held title to their property via a Statutory Warranty Deed from December 5, 2007. They maintained ownership and exclusive possession of their tract for over 17 years. The Plaintiffs claimed legal entitlement to the quiet enjoyment and exclusive use of all their property, including Lots 30 and 31. This civil action fell under mandatory non-binding arbitration and involved a small tort claim amount.

Cause

The Plaintiffs' sole claim for relief was trespass to land. They alleged that the Defendant, Rebecca Fraze, and her agents repeatedly entered and encroached upon their property. The specific area of contention was the parking area located on Lot 30 of the Plaintiffs' property.

The alleged trespassing began in September

Continue Reading This Article

Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.

Unlimited access to all articles
Expert legal analysis and insights
Downloadable resources and templates
Subscribe Now Login to Access

You've reached your free article limit for this month

Tags

Trespass Case
Real Property
Oregon Lawsuit

About the Author

SC
Sohini Chakraborty
Editor
Sohini Chakraborty is a law graduate, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies. She delivers well-structured legal summaries.