Wrongful Death Lawsuit Over Cardiac Care Heads to Court
Patient Under Care: Raymond Tedeschi’s Medical History
Raymond G. Tedeschi was under the care of Dr. Matthew J. Neulander, Dr. Anthony LaSala, and Starling Physicians, P.C. He received treatment for cardiac symptoms at facilities operated by Trinity Health of New England Corporation, Inc., doing business as Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center. His condition raised concerns that required immediate cardiac evaluation and intervention, which he did not receive.
What Went Wrong: Missed Steps and Medical Oversight
James Tedeschi, as administrator of Raymond’s estate, alleged that Raymond’s care team failed to act on clear warning signs. They did not admit him for cardiac monitoring, communicate abnormal test results, or apply a life-saving cardiac device. The physicians also failed to consult a cardiologist or follow established medical procedures. These missed steps formed the basis of the lawsuit for medical negligence and wrongful death.
Medical Crisis: The Outcome of Inaction
Raymond suffered multiple cardiac arrests that led to severe complications—brain damage, heart failure, and seizures. These conditions caused extreme physical and emotional suffering. He lost the ability to enjoy daily life and engage in normal activities. Eventually, the injuries led to his death, affecting both his quality of life and his family’s future.
Seeking Justice: Losses Claimed by the Estate
The Plaintiff sought financial compensation for the harm Raymond endured before his death. This included damages for pain, emotional suffering, and medical complications. The claim also covered funeral expenses, lost earning potential, and the lasting emotional and financial impact on Raymond’s estate and loved ones.
Key Arguments and Proceedings
Legal Representation
Plaintiff: James Tedeschi, Administrator of the Estate of Raymond G. Tedeschi
Counsel for Plaintiff: John J. Kennedy Jr.
Defendants: Trinity Health of New England Corporation, Inc. | Matthew J. Neulander, MD | Starling Physicians, P.C. | Anthony LaSala, MD
Counsel for Defendants: Robert E. Kiley | Frank J. Garofalo III | Sandy T. Roussas
Accountability in Court: Allegations Against Medical Providers
James Tedeschi filed suit under Connecticut’s wrongful death statute. He named Dr. Neulander, Dr. LaSala, and Starling Physicians, P.C. The complaint charged them with failing to diagnose, treat, and communicate effectively regarding life-threatening conditions. The Plaintiff argued that their collective negligence resulted in a preventable and tragic loss of life.
Defense
Defendants Dr. Anthony LaSala and Starling Physicians, P.C. denied all allegations of negligence in the Third and Fourth Counts of the complaint. They admitted that Dr. LaSala evaluated Raymond Tedeschi on December 5, 2018, diagnosed presumed viral cardiomyopathy with acute congestive heart failure symptoms, and recommended further tests. However, they denied any failure in care or responsibility for the alleged harm. They asserted insufficient knowledge to respond to several factual claims and left the plaintiff to his proof.
Defendants Trinity Health of New England Corporation, Inc. and Dr. Matthew Neulander also denied the core allegations. While they admitted that Tedeschi was treated at Saint Francis Hospital on December 2, 2018, and was started on Lasix before being discharged, they rejected any suggestion of negligent treatment. They claimed insufficient knowledge to verify several statements and fully denied responsibility for the injuries and death alleged in the complaint. Both sets of Defendants disclaimed liability for counts not specifically directed at them.
What comes next
The court scheduled the next hearing in the wrongful death case of James Tedeschi v. multiple healthcare providers for August 18, 2025. The case remained pending, with both sides actively engaged in litigation. The court previously heard responses from the defendants, who denied liability for the alleged medical negligence that led to Raymond Tedeschi’s death. The upcoming hearing aimed to address procedural issues and move the case closer to resolution or trial.