Jurimatic by Exlitem

Santa Clara County Cleared in Constitutional Rights Case Filed by Veteran Over Alleged Abuse and Unlawful Detention

Santa Clara County Cleared in Constitutional Rights Case Filed by Veteran Over Alleged Abuse and Unlawful Detention

N
Nishica Srivastava
November 6, 2024
Santa Clara County Cleared in Constitutional Rights Case Filed by Veteran Over Alleged Abuse and Unlawful Detention

Johnson V. County Of Santa Clara Et Al

Case Background

On October 12, 2018, Andrew Johnson, an Army veteran, filed a civil rights lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, after Santa Clara County mistreated him in its jails.
Officers with the San Jose Police Department intentionally destroyed evidence, leading to Andrew Lee Johnson's wrongful incarceration for over three years. The destroyed evidence was not discovered until Johnson's jury trial, where he was ultimately acquitted. During his incarceration, Johnson endured torture in solitary confinement and was denied adequate medical and mental health care.
Defendants in this case include Correctional Officers for the County, namely, Deputy Ruban, Matthew Reeves, Dominguez, Lubrin, Benson, and Does 1-25, the other correctional deputies for the County. The City of San Jose, a municipal corporation, operates the San Jose Police Department (SJPD). Police officers from the City involved are Marco Monzon, Trent Tessler, and Jamie Hall, all acting under the color of law and within the scope of their employment for the City. Additionally, Does 1-25 (City) are employees of the City involved in the alleged actions.

Cause

Andrew Johnson’s legal troubles began after an incident in October 2014, when he shot two men in self-defense after they threatened him with a knife. Despite his acquittal in 2017, Johnson endured over three years of wrongful incarceration in Santa Clara County Jail, where he faced severe mistreatment. The authorities placed Johnson in solitary confinemen

Continue Reading This Article

Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.

Unlimited access to all articles
Expert legal analysis and insights
Downloadable resources and templates
Subscribe Now Login to Access

You've reached your free article limit for this month

Tags

civil rights
Malicious prosecution
INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.
Americans with Disabilities Act
unconstitutional
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Unlawful Detention
malicious prosecution
intentional infliction of emotional distress.
americans with disabilities act
cruel and unusual punishment
unlawful detention