Jurimatic by Exlitem

Radin Logistics settles Watson wage claim for $120,000.

Radin Logistics settles Watson wage claim for $120,000.

S
Sohini Chakraborty
January 19, 2026

Table of Contents

Case Background

Demetrius Watson initiated a class-action lawsuit in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles on October 12, 2022. He brought the action on behalf of himself and other similarly situated hourly-paid or non-exempt employees who worked for Radin Logistics LLC in California. Watson alleged that the company had maintained a systematic policy of labor law violations throughout his employment, which began around March 2022. This legal battle centered on the fundamental rights of workers to receive proper pay and designated rest periods under the California Labor Code.

Cause

The dispute arose from Radin Logistics’ alleged failure to adhere to California’s strict wage and hour regulations. Watson claimed that the company frequently required employees to work without providing the legally mandated thirty-minute meal breaks or ten-minute rest periods. Furthermore, he alleged that the company failed to pay all earned overtime wages and neglected to reimburse workers for necessary business expenses, such as the use of personal cell phones for work-related duties. The complaint suggested that these were not isolated incidents but rather part of a broader corporate strategy to minimize labor costs at the expense of the workforce.

Injury

The injury in this case was primarily economic and systemic. Watson and his colleagues suffered from "wage theft" in the form of unpaid regular and overtime hours. By denying proper breaks, the company also deprived workers of the physical and mental recovery time guaranteed by state law. Additionally, employees faced the unfair burden of paying for company expenses out of their own pockets. Beyond the immediate financial loss, Watson highlighted the "injury" to the public interest, as the company’s alleged actions created an unfair competitive advantage over law-abiding businesses.

Damages Sought

Watson pursued a comprehensive list of damages to rectify the alleged labor violations. He sought the recovery of all unpaid wages, including overtime and double-time pay, along with premium pay for every missed meal and rest period. The lawsuit also demanded full reimbursement for business expenses and the payment of statutory penalties for inaccurate wage statements and late payment of wages. Furthermore, Watson requested an injunction to stop the company from continuing these practices and asked the Court to award interest, attorney’s fees, and legal costs.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

Legal Representation

Plaintiff(s): Demetrius Watson.

  • Counsel for Plaintiff(s): Douglas Han | Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh | Jason Rothman

Defendant(s): Radin Logistics LLC and Reza Rahimi.

  • Counsel for Defendant(s): Tim L. Johnson

Key Arguments or Remarks by Counsel

The legal team at Justice Law Corporation argued that Radin Logistics had intentionally ignored the California Labor Code to bolster its profits. They contended that the company failed to implement a reliable system for tracking hours and ensuring breaks were taken. Counsel emphasized that when employees used their personal phones for company business without reimbursement, the company essentially shifted its operating costs onto its lowest-paid workers. They framed the case as a necessary step to hold the employer accountable and to ensure that all "aggrieved employees" received the pay they had rightfully earned.

Claims

Unpaid Overtime and Minimum Wage

Watson alleged that the company failed to pay the legal minimum wage for all hours worked and frequently shortchanged employees on overtime pay. He argued that the company often required work "off the clock," which resulted in a failure to compensate workers for the true duration of their labor.

Meal and Rest Period Violations

The complaint stated that Radin Logistics did not provide uninterrupted meal breaks or rest periods as required by law. Watson claimed that even when breaks were scheduled, work demands often forced employees to cut them short or skip them entirely without receiving the mandatory "premium" pay as a penalty.

Wage Statement and Reimbursement Failures

Watson claimed that the wage stubs provided by the company were inaccurate because they failed to show the total hours worked or the correct rates of pay. Furthermore, he alleged that the company never reimbursed workers for the necessary use of their personal equipment, violating the requirement that employers must bear the costs of doing business.

Defense

While the initial complaint outlined the accusations, companies in this position typically argue that their policies are legally compliant and that any discrepancies are the result of individual employee errors rather than corporate policy. A common defense is to claim that employees were provided the opportunity to take breaks but chose not to, or that the business expenses in question were not "necessary" for the job.

Settlement

The legal dispute concluded when the parties reached a settlement agreement to resolve the claims of the class. To avoid the high costs and risks associated with a lengthy trial and the potential for a massive judgment, Radin Logistics LLC agreed to a total settlement of $120,000. This amount was intended to cover the unpaid wages, penalties, and legal fees associated with the claims brought by Demetrius Watson on behalf of himself and the other affected workers. The settlement provided a structured way to compensate the employees for their losses while bringing a definitive end to the litigation.

Court documents are available upon request at jurimatic@exlitem.com

Tags

Class Action Litigation
Wage Theft
Unpaid Overtime

About the Author

SC
Sohini Chakraborty
Editor
Sohini Chakraborty is a law graduate, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies. She delivers well-structured legal summaries.