Arlette Milenka Irrazabal vs. Jerry Maynard Shipley
Case Background
On January 8, 2020, Plaintiff Arlette Milenka Irrazabal filed a motor vehicle accident lawsuit in the California Superior Court, Los Angeles County (Case number: 20STCV00779). Judge Daniel M. Crowley presided over this case.
Cause
On November 2, 2018, Arlette Milenka Irrazabal, the plaintiff, was involved in a motor vehicle accident at the intersection of Normandie Avenue and 250th Street in Lomita, Los Angeles County, California. The defendant, Jerry Maynard Shipley, negligently operated his motor vehicle, causing the collision. Shipley acted as the driver, owner, and possibly an agent within the scope of his employment. The plaintiff claims that the defendant’s failure to exercise reasonable care directly caused the motor vehicle accident.
Injuries
As a result of the motor vehicle accident, the plaintiff sustained severe physical injuries. She required extensive medical treatment, including hospitalization and ongoing care. The injuries significantly impacted her ability to perform daily activities and caused considerable pain and suffering. Additionally, the physical harm led to a loss of earning capacity, as the plaintiff was unable to work effectively.
Damages
Arlette Milenka Irrazabal suffered various damages, which included:
- Medical expenses for immediate and ongoing treatment.
- Loss of income due to her inability to work.
- Pain and suffering from both physical and emotional trauma.
- Property damage to her vehicle.
- General damages for the diminished quality of life.
Key Arguments and Proceedings
Legal representation
- Plaintiff(s): Arlette Milenka Irrazabal
- Counsel for Plaintiff: Brennan S. Huelse
- Defendant(s): Jerry Maynard Shipley
- Counsel for Defendants: Robert Gregory McKeon
Claims
The plaintiff filed a personal injury lawsuit against Jerry Maynard Shipley, asserting negligence. She sought compensatory damages to cover medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, property damage, and the loss of earning capacity. The complaint emphasized that the defendant violated the duty of care required to ensure safety on the road, which directly contributed to the motor vehicle accident.
Defense
The defense, Jerry Maynard Shipley, denied all allegations made in the plaintiff’s complaint. They argued that Arlette Milenka Irrazabal did not sustain injuries or damages due to any actions or omissions by the defendant. The defense also contended that the plaintiff’s negligence, including reckless driving and failure to wear a seatbelt, contributed to the motor vehicle accident. Furthermore, the defense invoked legal protections under California law, including limits on liability specified in the Vehicle Code. They claimed that the plaintiff assumed the risks associated with her actions and sought a judgment in their favor, including recovery of legal costs.
Jury Verdict
After considering all evidence and arguments, the jury found in favor of the defendant, Jerry Maynard Shipley. The jury concluded that the defendant was not liable for the plaintiff’s alleged injuries or damages. They determined that the plaintiff’s negligence, including her failure to wear a seatbelt and other contributing factors, played a significant role in the motor vehicle accident. Consequently, the jury rejected the plaintiff’s claims and ruled that she was not entitled to any compensation.
Court Documents:
Documents are available for purchase upon request at jurimatic@exlitem.com
Leave A Comment