Jurimatic by Exlitem

Jury Awards $3.3M in Joshua Campos Jail Death

3 min read

Jury Awards $3.3M in Joshua Campos Jail Death

A
Angad Chatha
August 12, 2025

Table of Contents

Case Background

On March 4, 2022, deputies booked Joshua Campos into Orange County custody. Medical staff assessed him with severe mental illness, including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, polysubstance abuse, suicidal thoughts, and hallucinations. Despite these risks, authorities placed him in the general population at Theo Lacy Jail. Regulations under Title 15 required regular safety checks, yet the complaint alleges these were inconsistent and superficial.

Cause

On March 7, 2022, video footage allegedly showed Campos snorting a substance in his cell at 10:07 p.m. He soon displayed signs of distress and became unresponsive. His cellmate repeatedly pressed the emergency button and called for help. Plaintiffs claim deputies delayed their response for roughly ten minutes while Campos was in respiratory arrest. They also allege systemic failures, including improper housing of mentally ill inmates, poor contraband control, inadequate safety checks, and lack of medication compliance enforcement.

Injury

Campos died in custody that night. Plaintiffs Jay and Rosalee Campos, his parents, claimed emotional devastation from the loss of their son. They alleged his death caused loss of companionship, love, and support. They also cited pain and suffering endured by Campos before his death.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought compensatory damages for wrongful death and survival claims, funeral and burial expenses, and pre-death suffering. They requested punitive damages against individual defendants, attorney’s fees, litigation costs, and any other relief the court deemed appropriate.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

Legal Representation

  • Plaintiff(s): Jay Campos (individually and as successor in interest to Joshua Campos) | Rosalee Campos (individually and as successor in interest to Joshua Campos)

  • Counsel for Plaintiff: Christian M. Contreras | Humberto M. Guizar

  • Defendant(s): County of Orange | Sean Kim | Richard Covington | Nathaniel Meza | Zhanna Shrovak | Abelardo Garcia | Joshua Harvey | Lloyd Nguyen | Does 1–10

  • Counsel for Defendants: Michael L. Wroniak | James Christopher Jardin | Bonnie J. Bennett

Claims

Plaintiffs filed claims for: negligence/wrongful death; violation of the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act; denial of medical care under the Fourteenth Amendment; interference with familial association; municipal liability for unconstitutional policy or custom; municipal liability for failure to train; and failure to protect from harm. They named the County of Orange, several deputies, and Doe defendants as responsible parties.

Defense

The defendants raised multiple affirmative defenses, asserting that the plaintiffs’ complaint failed to state a valid legal claim and that the defendants acted lawfully, in good faith, and with probable cause. They argued entitlement to qualified and absolute immunity, the inapplicability of respondeat superior to §1983 claims, and that no constitutional or statutory rights were violated. They contended that simple negligence is insufficient for federal civil rights liability, that a single incident cannot establish an unconstitutional policy, and that their actions were privileged and in line with established law and procedures.

They further claimed the plaintiffs failed to exhaust available remedies, mitigate damages, or comply with the California Tort Claims Act. Additional defenses included comparative fault, exigent circumstances, waiver, unclean hands, statutes of limitations, laches, and lack of causation. The defendants also challenged the basis for compensatory and punitive damages and reserved the right to assert further defenses as needed.

Verdict

On March 14, 2025, the jury returned a verdict awarding the plaintiffs $1.2 million in damages for the loss of Joshua Campos’s life and $2.1 million for wrongful death, totaling $3.3 million in compensation.

Court Documents

Court documents are available for purchase upon request at Jurimatic@exlitem.com

Categories

Tags

Jury Verdict
Loss Of Life Damages
Mental Illness In Custody

About the Author

AC
Angad Chatha
Writer
Angad Chatha is a law graduate from Amritsar, Punjab, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. He has developed a strong niche in working with expert witnesses, providing critical support in preparing legal research and case studies. Known for his analytical mindset and attention to detail, Angad consistently delivers thorough and well-grounded insights that enhance case summaries. His commitment to accuracy and a deep understanding of legal frameworks make him a valuable asset in complex legal sector.