2 min read
2 min read
Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Settles False Claims Act Violations Lawsuit for $59.7 Million
N
Nishica Srivastava
February 4, 2025

United States Of America V. Sealed Defendant 1 Et Al
Case Background
The United States and the Plaintiff States (the United States and the Plaintiff States are collectively referred to herein as the “Government”) through their qui tam Relator Patricia Frattasio, sued Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its holding company, Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Holding Company, Ltd. under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. They sought damages, penalties, and other remedies under federal and state false claims laws. Whistleblower Patricia Frattasio accused Biohaven of submitting fraudulent claims for payment to Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, and VA. The claims allegedly violated the Anti-Kickback Statute. Frattasio claimed that Biohaven offered financial incentives to healthcare providers, such as speaking fees and meals, to encourage them to prescribe Nurtec ODT to federal healthcare beneficiaries. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Rochester). Honorable Charles J. Siragusa presided over the case [Case Number: 6:21cv6539].Cause
Continue Reading This Article
Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.
Unlimited access to all articles
Expert legal analysis and insights
Downloadable resources and templates
Tags
settlement
fraud
False Claims Act
Anti-Kickback Statute
false claims act
anti-kickback statute