Moss v. Kentucky Oaks Mall
Case Background
Dennis Moss filed a premises liability lawsuit against Kentucky Oaks Mall after he slipped on a puddle in a mall bathroom and suffered both a postconcussive syndrome and the aggravation of degenerative cervical and lumbar conditions. The lawsuit was filed in the McCracken County Courthouse, Kentucky. Judge Joseph Roark presided over the case. [Case number: 20-583]
Cause
Damages
Key Arguments and Proceedings
Legal Representation
- Plaintiff(s): Dennis Moss
- Counsel for Plaintiff(s): Kelli Lester | Lauren Marley | Andrew K. Asbridge | Dion Moorman
- Defendant(s): Kentucky Oaks Mall
- Counsel for Defendant(s): William E. Pinkston
Claims
Moss sued Kentucky Oaks, claiming it acted negligently by failing to notice or clean up the spill. He argued the mall did not exercise reasonable care.
Surveillance footage showed a custodian in the bathroom minutes before Moss fell. However, no evidence confirmed the custodian cleaned anything or conducted an inspection as required by mall policies.
Moss’s strongest evidence came from the security guard, who initially described the puddle as football-sized but later recalled it being much smaller at trial.
Defense
Kentucky Oaks challenged the claim that Moss slipped on a puddle.
Although a security guard noticed a small “spot of water,” it measured only six by three inches. The defense suggested Moss may have stubbed his toe or, as one witness speculated, faked the fall.
The mall also argued that it took reasonable steps to maintain safety. The bathroom had undergone its regular deep cleaning the night before the incident.
Jury Verdict
The trial lasted three days. To win, the plaintiff had to prove four key points: a liquid substance was on the floor, it played a major role in Moss’s fall, the floor was not reasonably safe, and the mall either knew or should have known about the hazard.
After outlining these requirements, on February 6, 2025, the jury was asked if Kentucky Oaks was at fault. It answered yes. The jury also rejected any claim that Moss was partially responsible for the fall.
Regarding damages, Moss received the full amount of his medical expenses and $345,071 for future care. The jury awarded an even $1,000,000 for pain and suffering. The total verdict was $1,837,756 in this premises liability case.
Court Documents:
Documents are available for purchase upon request at jurimatic@exlitem.com
Leave A Comment