Webster v. Bailey

Case Background

Shirra Webster filed a lawsuit against her husband’s mistress, seeking damages for intentionally interfering with her marriage and leading to alienation of affection from her husband. The lawsuit was filed in the 16th Circuit Court
of Jackson County Missouri, with Judge Calvin D. Taylor presiding.[Case number: 22-165]

Cause

Shirra Webster married Derrick in April 2018, describing their marriage as happy. They lived together in a camper with their children.

However, the Websters’ troubles began in September 2021 when Derrick traveled to Missouri for work. While there, he met Samantha Bailey, a resident of Lathrop, Missouri, near Kansas City. Their connection grew quickly, and evidence of a developing romance emerged. This evidence included phone calls, texts, and Snapchats. Derrick and Bailey also arranged meetings in Missouri and New Orleans.

By January 2022, the marriage had deteriorated, and Derrick moved out of the marital home.

Damages

In this lawsuit, Shirra sought compensation from Bailey for the emotional harm caused by the loss of affection.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

Legal Representation

  • Plaintiff(s): Shirra Webster
    • Counsel for Plaintiff(s): Katina Seymour
  • Defendant(s): Samantha Bailey
    • Counsel for Defendant(s): Neshondria “Shon” Ellerby

Claims

Shirra had to prove that (1) Bailey intentionally and wrongfully interfered with the marriage, (2) this interference led to the alienation of affection and love of her husband, and (3) the interference caused harm to Shirra.

Defense

Samantha Bailey denied having any role in ending the marriage and causing the loss of Shirra’s husband’s affection.

Jury Verdict

On August 28, 2024, the jury in this case reviewed separate questions regarding the three issues. It answered “yes” for Shirra on the “intentional and wrongful interference” point. However, the jury then answered “no” for Bailey, concluding that this interference did not cause Shirra to lose Derrick’s love and affection. As a result, the jury ended its deliberations without addressing damages. A defense judgment was then entered in favor of Bailey.

Court Documents:

Documents are available for purchase upon request at jurimatic@exlitem.com