Story v. Ascension Medical Group Indiana
Case Background
Dr. Timothy Story filed a breach of contract lawsuit against Ascension Medical Group Indiana. He claimed wrongful termination and tortious interference after they wrongfully interfered with his business relationships by terminating his employment in violation of the contract. Dr. Story also argued that Ascension interfered with his medical practice after he complied with a subpoena to release patient records for a DEA investigation.
Dr. Story initially filed the case in Indiana Superior Court, Marion County. In response, Ascension filed a motion to change the venue, arguing that its main office was located in Hamilton County.
The Court approved the motion and transferred the case to Indiana Superior Court, Hamilton County. Judge David K. Najjar presided over this case. [Case number: 29D05-2105-PL-3135]
Cause
In 2005, Dr. Timothy Story, an internal medicine specialist, co-owned the concierge medical practice FirstLine PHC with Dr. Kevin McCallum. Patients paid an annual fee for 24/7 access to physicians. The doctors later expanded their practice by partnering with Ascension Medical Group Indiana. On June 25, 2010, Dr. Story signed an employment agreement with Ascension and began working there on July 1, 2010.
Both doctors worked for Ascension, which provided malpractice insurance, but had no ownership in FirstLine. In spring 2020, the DEA subpoenaed Dr. Story for medical records in connection with an investigation into one of his patients. Concerned, Dr. Story hired legal counsel, who confirmed he was not under investigation. Acting on this, Dr. Story provided the records but did not inform Ascension, as he was advised to keep it confidential.
The DEA noticed the records appeared to belong to Ascension, prompting them to contact Ascension for more records. Ascension then launched an investigation and discovered several issues, including Dr. Story’s failure to notify them about the subpoena and his lack of state-mandated agreements for opioid prescriptions. Ascension also found improper documentation of patient interactions and Medicare billing, leading to a $115,867 refund to the government.
Ascension viewed Dr. Story’s actions as a breach of his employment contract and called a meeting with him on August 26, 2020. After alleging his lack of cooperation, Ascension terminated his employment the following day. On August 28, Ascension canceled his malpractice insurance, delaying Dr. Story’s ability to treat patients.
Dr. Story eventually obtained new insurance and resumed practice in September 2020. Tensions escalated when Ascension informed Dr. McCallum it would no longer cover malpractice insurance for treating Dr. Story’s patients. Additionally, Ascension allegedly obstructed Dr. Story’s requests for patient lab results.
Damages
Dr. Timothy Story sought damages for the losses suffered as a result of his wrongful termination due to Ascension’s breach of contract and tortious interference.
Key Arguments and Proceedings
Legal Representation
- Plaintiff(s): Dr. Timothy Story
- Counsel for Plaintiff(s): Kathleen A. DeLaney | Christopher S. Stake
- Defendant(s): Ascension Medical Group Indiana
- Counsel for Defendant(s): Andrew M. McNeil | Bradley M. Dick
Claims
Defense
Ascension defended itself by denying any wrongdoing. It argued that Dr. Story had a clear duty under the contract to inform them about the subpoena and obtain their permission before releasing patient records. Ascension claimed that Dr. Story’s failure to meet this obligation, along with other alleged misconduct, justified his termination.
Additionally, Ascension contended that Indiana law did not recognize a claim for tortious interference in business relationships when the issues were covered by a contract. Ascension also pointed out that Dr. McCallum, a partner in FirstLine, had approved the sign change, so Ascension should not be held responsible.
The court granted partial summary judgment to Ascension regarding the sign change and the failure to cover Dr. Story’s malpractice insurance. The litigation continued with the remaining claims.
Jury Verdict
Court Documents:
Available upon request
Leave A Comment