Jurimatic by Exlitem

$8M Victory for Billionaire Christopher Chandler in Defamation Case Over False Russian Intelligence Links

$8M Victory for Billionaire Christopher Chandler in Defamation Case Over False Russian Intelligence Links

N
Nishica Srivastava
October 25, 2024
$8M Victory for Billionaire Christopher Chandler in Defamation Case Over False Russian Intelligence Links

Chandler V. Berlin Et Al

Case Background

On September 14, 2018, Christopher Chandler, chairman and founder of the global investment firm Legatum Group, filed a defamation lawsuit against Donald Berlin. The case revolved around a 2003 dossier created by Berlin containing explosive false allegations against Chandler that were repeated by Members of Parliament and the British press beginning in 2017. The defamation suit was filed in the United States District Court, District of Columbia (Washington, DC). Judge Amit P. Mehta presided over this case. [Case number: 1:18cv2136]

Cause

Plaintiff Christopher Chandler filed a defamation lawsuit against Donald Berlin and his network of corporate entities known as Investigative Consultants Inc. (ICI). Berlin used ICI to deceive individuals seeking investigative services. He lured clients into paying exorbitant fees for worthless background reports filled with damaging false claims about various individuals, including the Chandler brothers. Between 2002 and 2003, Berlin attempted to defraud Prince Albert II of Monaco, using Robert Eringer as an intermediary. He sought payment for fake background checks on successful expatriates, including Christopher Chandler and his brother. To solicit these payments, Berlin created a 134-page document known as the Pitch. This document included outrageous false accusations, claiming the Chandlers were involved in money laundering, organized crime, and espionage. In his Pitch, Berlin inaccurately linked the Chandler brothers' investment firm, Sovereign Asset Management Limited, with unrelated companies in Bristol and Switzerland that faced legal issues. He manipulated information from various sources, presenting it as if it were credible intelligence. Additionally, he fabricated a legal dispute involving Credit Agricole Indosuez and falsely implicated the Chandlers in a conspiracy related to it. Berlin's claims escalated to absurd levels, including accusations of the brothers being Russian spies. These allegations were based on completely false assertions, such as an alleged award and supposed secret operations. His lack of genuine expertise led to glaring inaccuracies in his fabricated narrative, including outdated references to technology. In 2004, Eringer used information from Berlin’s Pitch for his report on the Chandler brothers, which he submitted to Prince Albert. By November 2017, Eringer disseminated the Pitch and the Eringer Report, leading to false media reports about Chandler's supposed criminal activities. In May 2018, the British press began reporting these baseless allegations.

Damages

The Defendants intentionally and maliciously made the libelous statements, showing a clear disregard for Chandler's rights and reputation. They lacked any privilege or legal authority to publish these false claims. These libelous statements caused significant harm to Chandler, resulting in injuries that the law presumed. The injuries included accusations of serious crimes against him, damage to his reputation, and implications about his conduct that could harm his business reputation. Add

Continue Reading This Article

Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.

Unlimited access to all articles
Expert legal analysis and insights
Downloadable resources and templates
Subscribe Now Login to Access

You've reached your free article limit for this month

Tags

punitive damages
DEFAMATION
libel
fabrication
false statements
summary judgment
defamation