Jurimatic by Exlitem

$18.6M Verdict in Twin Hill Uniform Case

$18.6M Verdict in Twin Hill Uniform Case

S
Sohini Chakraborty
September 23, 2025

Table of Contents

Case Background

In September 2016, American Airlines introduced new uniforms for its employees, including flight attendants, pilots, and ground staff. Defendant Twin Hill Acquisition Company, a subsidiary of Tailored Brands, designed and manufactured these uniforms. The airline distributed about 1.4 million garments to more than 65,000 employees worldwide. Soon after distribution, employees reported health concerns linked to wearing or being near the uniforms.

Cause

The plaintiffs alleged the uniforms contained harmful chemicals such as formaldehyde, toluene, nickel, arsenic, and other toxins. They claimed Twin Hill and Tailored Brands negligently designed, manufactured, and distributed defective garments without adequate testing or warnings. Thousands of complaints poured into flight attendant unions. American Airlines acknowledged the issue, set up a call center, and offered replacement garments. Plaintiffs asserted that the manufacturers knew about the risks but failed to recall the uniforms or warn employees.

Injury

Employees reported a wide range of health issues after wearing the uniforms. They experienced skin rashes, respiratory irritation, neurological symptoms, and immune system problems. Many reported persistent inflammation, allergic reactions, and nerve damage. Plaintiffs alleged these injuries caused pain, suffering, and in some cases permanent disability. They argued the uniforms created unsafe working conditions and harmed their ability to perform normal job functions.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought general damages for physical and emotional suffering. They also demanded compensation for medical care, hospital expenses, and ongoing treatment.

Continue Reading This Article

Subscribe to access this article and our entire library of legal content.

Unlimited access to all articles
Expert legal analysis and insights
Downloadable resources and templates
Subscribe Now Login to Access

You've reached your free article limit for this month

Tags

Toxic Chemicals In Uniforms
Airline Employee Health Issues
Alameda County Jury Verdict

Experts Referenced

HP
Dr. Howard Elliot Pitchon
Infectious Disease
NB
Dr. Nachman A. Brautbar
Internal Medicine
KV
Karl Erik Volk
Economics
MF
Dr. Marion Joseph Fedoruk
Occupational Medicine
JB
Dr. Jonathan Steven Becker
Internal Medicine
AO
Abigail Oelker
Polymer Science
JF
John Fessler
building mechanical systems
MG
Miguel Gonzalez
Polymer Science
TL
Timothy Lanning
Economics
DB
Dr. David S. Brookstein
Mechanical Engineering
PA
Dr. Pamela Jill Anderson-mahoney
Epidemiology
SM
Dr. Susan A. Maline
Internal Medicine
SL
Dr. Shiva Lalezar
Family Medicine
DN
Dr. Dan I. Naim
Internal Medicine
SM
Dr. Stephanie L. Mccarter
Internal Medicine
AS
Dr. Adrienne R. Sprouse
Emergency Medicine
JF
Dr. Jordan A. Firestone
Neurology
EF
Dr. Edward J. Faeder
Environmental Health

About the Author

SC
Sohini Chakraborty
Editor
Sohini Chakraborty is a law graduate, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies. She delivers well-structured legal summaries.